Recently I was engaged in a conversation with a young man who came from a culture completely different from my own. The tragedies he witnessed make the insecurities I inherited from a judgmental society shrivel and dry. I will not include the country from which he escaped as a small boy, but I will say that his experiences are those that are harrowing and inspiring in the same moment.
Our conversation revolved around the issue of culture and what is right. Obviously, coming from very different backgrounds we were unable to completely understand one another on issues such as womens’ right and the right to determine one’s own sexual orientation. Huffing and puffing did occur in our determination to find common ground amid landscapes created by such different weather patterns. The moment of agreement did come when we both returned to the starting point: cultures are ingrained in our individual realities and cultures other than our own should not be analyzed without recognition of our own cultural beliefs.
His main point was that he did not believe it was right for himself or any ‘other’ to walk into his village and suggest that every person in that community has the inherent right to determine his or her own sexual orientation. I completely agree. Even though my indignant demand for equality in my culture attempted to overpower my adherence to cultural relativity, I was able to agree that no one culture has the right to believe the path that they follow, the moral values that they tout are true and correct.
Though I believe this and in every part of my life attempt to recognize my bias before making a judgement or observation about something different from myself, it also creates a sticky situation for globalization, international intervention, and other forms of cross-cultural exchange. How do we determine when and why to intervene and who are the illustrious we? We have a toothless United Nations that secretly wants to reconfigure the power structure of the world, but those who benefit the most from the current power structure live at the top, so why change? Then we have semi-autonomous organizations like the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which can choose to intervene in countries throughout the world, with little definition of what they use to qualify intervention. Is it possible to shed these organizations and return to a pre-World War conception of the nation state? Even then there was foreign intervention.
In some ways it still seems as though we live in a Cold War era, but instead of Capitalism versus Communism, it is now Rationality versus Religious extremism that has been termed Terrorism. The allusive we are still supporting a hegemonic reality, but at times I move toward the idea that general public around the world are uniting, while those who hold concentrated power are moving away from representing the people and looking toward integration in a global power struggle, economic, social and most importantly, ideological.
To return to the narrative, during this conversation with this culturally estranged, but human being just the same, I was forced (yet again) to realize the insignificance of my crusade to constantly evaluate how my bias is forcing my perception into a certain pigeon hole. Until we can recognize that there is not right answer, that we all have our own bias….I am not sure what to do.
Ah, yet again a ramble that leads to confusion.